odoc
for Authors
This manual describes the features available and recommended for users in order to write great documentation with odoc
. See also the page listing the language features odoc
understands.
- Getting Started
- Documenting Your Interfaces
- Writing Documentation Pages
Getting Started
To generate documentation for your project, you will almost always be using odoc
indirectly rather than executing it yourself. There are currently several 'drivers' of odoc
at time of writing, each with their own strengths and weaknesses:
The reference driver is the most up-to-date driver, and incorporates all of the features of odoc. It is written to build the docs locally as well as those published on ocaml.org. It does not feature fast rebuilds, nor keeping a switch-wide cache of documentation. Install the driver and the package to document via opam
and run
$ opam install odoc-driver <pkg>
$ odoc_driver <pkg>
to build the docs. The output will appear in the directory `_html` by default. Full documentation is available in the reference driver package.
Dune is the best way to view docs while developing your project. We have a page describing how to use it, but the short version is:
$ dune build @doc
and the results can be found here: _build/default/_doc/_html/index.html
Odig is the best way to view docs of your installed packages. After installing, try:
$ odig doc odig
Documenting a package
Documentation in OCaml is grouped together by package. Each package may contain a number of documentation pages, organised into a hierarchy, and if the package contains libraries, their interfaces form the rest of the package documentation. The pages are written in a subset of the usual odoc markup, and the libraries are documented via in-line special comments in the source. Conceptually, the docs for every library are contained within the docs of its package.
Quickstart
When a package is built with dune
, the simplest way to include docs in your package is to create a doc
dir, write doc/index.mld
file containing the documentation for your package:
{0 My package documentation}
This is the documentation for my package!
then create the following doc/dune
file:
(documentation)
More mld files can be added as necessary to the doc
directory, and they will be included also.
This will work if you've only got one package defined in your dune project. If you've got more than one, you'll need to let dune know which package the docs are associated with:
(documentation
(package my_package))
Any assets you have will also need to be handled, and as this is a new feature in odoc 3, at time of writing dune does not have a convenient syntax for this. However, it still can be done, so if, for example, you have an image asset.jpg
that you'd like to include in your doc, you can add the following to your doc/dune
file:
(install
(section doc)
(files (asset.jpg as odoc-pages/asset.jpg)))
Odoc 3.0 introduces a per-package configuration file, odoc-config.sexp, which is important if you'd like your documentation to link to the docs of other packages or libraries. If your documentation needs this configuration file, this will also need to be installed as follows:
(install
(section doc)
(files odoc-config.sexp))
Documenting Your Interfaces
As well as doc pages, odoc
is built to produce documentation for your libraries, and the unit of organisation for these is the module. Documentation is written by putting special comments into the source of the module interface or, less commonly, your module implementation.
For the HTML output, odoc
will produce one page for each module, module type, class, and class type. This includes any submodules, so if a module A
contains module B
then two HTML pages will be created. A/index.html
will have a link to A/B/index.html
at the point that module B
is defined. So each module, module type, class, and class type should be documented, keeping in mind that it will end up as a single page with a table of contents.
For each module, odoc
will describe all of the values, types, module types, classes, modules, and other elements found in module signatures. Their types or descriptions are documented along with any comments delineated by (** ... *)
, known as docstrings, found in the source code. For any element that references another, for example a value
that has a type
, odoc
will create links that point to the definitions.
Therefore, the job of the library author is to organise the module interface in a logical manner and write comments explaining each type, value, exception, type constructor, and everything else. The comments are written in a rich markup language that allows the usual formatting constructs: bold, italic, sub- and super-script, lists, verbatim and code sections, along with section headings, a very rich cross-referencing mechanism, and tags to add specific information to individual elements.
All the OCamldoc documentation comments described in the OCaml manual are supported, with a few important differences. In addition, it is intended that all features of the OCaml language are supported by odoc
. For examples of how the language features are handled, see the Features page.
Comments containing documentation are known as special comments. They are like normal comments except they have precisely two asterisks at the start:
(* Normal comment *)
(** Special comment containing documentation *)
(*** Normal comment *)
From here forward, 'comment' will refer to the special comments. Most comments will be associated with particular elements, and this requires the comment to be immediately before or after an element with no blank lines in between (although non-special comments are allowed). Comments that are not associated with a particular element are known as 'floating' comments.
If there is ambiguity, which can happen if there are two elements with a comment directly in between, the comment will be associated with both elements. This is an example of where odoc
differs from OCamldoc. Read more about that on the OCamldoc Differences page.
type x
(** Ambiguous comment, associated with {e both} {!x} and {!y} *)
type y
Although inherited from the compiler, this behaviour is unlikely to be desired, so a blank line should be inserted to clarify with which element the comment should be associated. Note that Dune will raise an error if there are ambiguous comments in the source files.
The first comment of a module is special, as it is associated with the module as a whole. This is discussed in more detail in the section on page structure.
The OCaml manual has a helpful example of comment placement, reproduced below. Note that there is an additional line inserted to avoid an ambiguous special comment.
(** The first special comment of the file is the comment associated
with the whole module.*)
(** Special comments can be placed between elements and are kept
by the OCamldoc tool, but are not associated to any element.
[@]-tags in these comments are ignored.*)
(*******************************************************************)
(** Comments like the one above, with more than two asterisks,
are ignored. *)
(** The comment for function f. *)
val f : int -> int -> int
(** The continuation of the comment for function f. *)
exception My_exception of (int -> int) * int
(* Hello, I'm a simple comment :-) *)
(** Comment for exception My_exception, even with a simple comment
between the special comment and the exception.*)
(** Comment for type weather *)
type weather =
| Rain of int (** The comment for constructor Rain *)
| Sun (** The comment for constructor Sun *)
(** Comment for type weather2 *)
type weather2 =
| Rain of int (** The comment for constructor Rain *)
| Sun (** The comment for constructor Sun *)
(** I can continue the comment for type weather2 here
because there is already a comment associated to the last constructor.*)
(** The comment for type my_record *)
type my_record = {
foo : int; (** Comment for field foo *)
bar : string; (** Comment for field bar *)
}
(** Continuation of comment for type my_record *)
(** Comment for foo *)
val foo : string
(** This comment is associated to foo and not to bar. *)
val bar : string
(** This comment is associated to bar. *)
class cl :
object
(** Interesting information about cl *)
end
(** The comment for class my_class *)
class my_class :
object
inherit cl
(** A comment to describe inheritance from cl *)
val mutable tutu : string
(** The comment for attribute tutu *)
val toto : int
(** The comment for attribute toto. *)
(** This comment is not attached to titi since
there is a blank line before titi, but is kept
as a comment in the class. *)
val titi : string
method toto : string
(** Comment for method toto *)
method m : float -> int
(** Comment for method m *)
end
(** The comment for the class type my_class_type *)
class type my_class_type =
object
val mutable x : int
(** The comment for variable x. *)
method m : int -> int
(** The comment for method m. *)
end
(** The comment for module Foo *)
module Foo : sig
val x : int
(** The comment for x *)
(** A special comment that is kept but not associated to any element *)
end
(** The comment for module type my_module_type. *)
module type my_module_type = sig
val x : int
(** The comment for value x. *)
(** The comment for module M. *)
module M : sig
val y : int
(** The comment for value y. *)
(* ... *)
end
end
The result of odoc
documenting this interface can be seen on the examples page here.
There are no differences in how odoc
handles comment placement between .ml
and .mli
files, which is another difference from OCamldoc.
Basic Markup
Text within the comments can be formatted using the following markup. Firstly, the simple typesetting markup:
{b <text>}
bold{i <text>}
italic{e <text>}
emphasis{^ <text>}
superscript{_ <text>}
subscript
Lists
Unordered lists:
{ul {- <item>}
{- <item>}
{- <item>}}
and ordered lists:
{ol {- <item 1>}
{- <item 2>}
{- <item 3>}}
Lists can contain block elements, apart from headings and tags.
There is also an abbreviated syntax for lists. The above could be written:
- <item>
- <item>
- <item>
and
+ <item 1>
+ <item 2>
+ <item 3>
In the abbreviated synyax, lists are ended by a blank line, or anything that cannot be part of a list item (a heading or a tag).
Code Blocks
There are various ways of inserting code elements in your documentation.
Inline Code Blocks
For inline, language agnostic source code style, use square brackets: [ ... ]
.
(** Here, [f 0] is [None] *)
Two consecutive newlines in an inline codeblock are forbidden, but in the interest of the 80-char rule, a single newline followed by horizontal space in an inline codeblock is considered as a single space:
(**
A very loooooooooooooooooooooooong line and [List.map (fun x -> x +1)].
is equivalent to:
A very loooooooooooooooooooooooong line and [List.map
(fun x -> x +1)].
*)
All the other existing ways to insert code are meant to be used for code blocks, not inline code fragments. Those will be formatted as a code block and will end the paragraph. Attempting to use them inline will trigger a warning.
OCaml Code Blocks
OCaml code blocks can be written using the enclosing tags {[ ... ]}
. The code inside these blocks will be properly styled as OCaml in the generated doc.
(** This how one binds a variable in OCaml:
{[
let x = 0
]}
*)
As of odoc.2.2
, it is possible to write blocks with explicit language headers. These blocks can be written using the enclosing tags {@<language>[ ... ]}
. The content of those block should be properly styled if highlight.js
supports the styling for the given language.
(** Here is some Python code:
{@python[
def f():
return 0
]}
*)
And rendered this becomes:
Here is some Python code:
def f():
return 0
Verbatim Blocks
It is possible to write language agnostic code blocks, also called verbatim blocks, using the enclosing tags {v ... v}
. The content of these blocks will be formatted as code but with no particular style applied.
(** Here is some code formatted text:
{v
Some text
v}
*)
Escaping
In most contexts, the characters { [ ] } @
all need to be escaped with a backslash. In inline source code style, only square brackets need to be escaped. However, as a convenience, matched square brackets need not be escaped to aid in typesetting code. For example, the following would be acceptable in a documentation comment:
The list [ [1;2;3] ] needs no escaping
In a code block section, the section is ended with a ]}
. In a verbatim formatted section, the section ends with a whitespace character followed by v}
. It is not currently possible to escape this in either case.
Links and References
A link to a URL may be put into the text as follows:
(** See {{: https://ocaml.org/ }the OCaml website} for news about OCaml *)
This will render as a link to https://ocaml.org/
with the text "the OCaml website"
References are links to other elements, e.g., comments might wish to refer to a module or type elsewhere as follows:
(** See the module {!Stdlib.Buffer} for more details *)
While odoc
supports the syntax for references used by OCamldoc, it has an improved syntax that allows for disambiguating in the face of clashing names. See the section reference_resolution
for an example of this.
The supported methods for referring to elements are:
- Bare:
{!Foo.bar}
- this works well if there are no ambiguities in what's being referred to. - OCamldoc:
{!type:Foo.bar}
- here the type
prefix applies to the last element, i.e., bar
. This is useful if there are several identifiers bar
in module Foo
, e.g., a type and a value. odoc
: {!module-Foo.type-bar}
- each element in the path may be prefixed by its type. This is useful if there are ambiguous elements in any part of the path, e.g., in this case perhaps there is a module type Foo
.odoc3
: {!/library_name/Module}
- this is a path to them module M
in library library_name
. This is useful if the module name is ambiguous, e.g., if there are two modules M
in different libraries. You may need to add the library to the per-package config file.odoc3
: {!/package/path/to/page-foo}
- this is a path to a page foo
in the package package
. The package will need to be added to the per-package config file.
The prefixes supported are:
module
module-type
(and the equivalent deprecated prefix modtype
)class
class-type
(and the equivalent deprecated prefix classtype
)val
(and the equivalent deprecated prefix value
)type
exception
(and the equivalent deprecated prefix exn
)method
constructor
(and the equivalent deprecated prefix const
) both for normal constructors and polymorphic constructors defined in a type alias. The backtick `
in polumorphic constructor is optional.extension
extension-decl
for refering to the declaration point of an extension constructorfield
(and the equivalent deprecated prefix recfield
)instance-variable
section
(and the equivalent deprecated prefix label
) - for referring to headingspage
- for referring to .mld
pages
In some cases the element being referenced might have a hyphen, a dot, or a space in the name, e.g., if trying to refer to a page from a .mld
file 1.2.3.mld
. In this case, the element name should be quoted with double quote marks:
{!page-"1.2.3"}
Module Lists
odoc
supports a special reference type for referring to a list of modules. The markup is:
{!modules: A B C}
This will generate a list of links to these modules. If the module has a synopsis (see later), this will be inserted into the list.
Reference Scope
odoc
uses the same scoping as OCaml when resolving references, but with one major difference. In a particular signature, all elements are in scope, even those later in the signature. Consider the following example:
(** In this floating comment, I can refer to type {!t} and value {!v}
declared later in the signature *)
type t
val v : t
Elements from parent modules are also in scope in child modules. Therefore the following will also work:
val x : int
val y : int
module A : sig
(** In this module, I can refer to val {!x}, declared above, as well as
type {!u}, declared later in the parent module. Elements declared
in this signature take priority, so {!y} refers to {!A.y} as
opposed to the [y] declared in the parent signature. *)
val y : string
end
type u
The above example can be seen rendered in the module Odoc_examples.Markup.Scope
.
odoc
allows modules to be 'opened' for the purposes of resolving references. By default, the module Stdlib
is 'opened', allowing references like {!List.t}
to work. This feature is enabled via the command-line flag --open
. Currently inline open
statements do not bring other elements into scope.
In order for odoc
to resolve links to other compilation units or .mld
pages, the referenced unit or page must be compiled and available to odoc
. That is, when performing the odoc link
command, one of the include paths passed via the command-line argument -I
must contain the relevant .odoc
file. This is normally the responsibility of the driver.
Tags are used to provide specific information for individual elements, such as author, version, parameters, etc. Tags start with an @
symbol. They should appear on their own lines with nothing but whitespace before them.
There are three types of tags. Those with:
- no associated data (simple tags),
- a single line of text (line tags), and
- a block of marked-up text (block tags).
Some tags can only be used on specific contexts: specific items (include
s, module
s, ...) or pages.
The three tags without data are hints to the HTML renderer to do with include
s. These are:
@open
- the contents of the include will be expanded by default in the HTML.@closed
- the contents of the include will be collapsed by default in the HTML.@inline
- the contents of the include will be rendered as if they were part of the signature.
These tags have a single line of data associated with them, string
in the examples below. They are:
@author string
- allows the element's author to be specified@since string
- declares from which version the element has been available@version string
- declares the version of the element itself@canonical string
- declares the path to this element's canonical instance. It can be applied to modules, module types, and types. See the Language Features page for more details
The tag's content is read from the rest of the line. It is also uninterpreted, i.e., there shouldn't be any odoc
markup.
These tags have a block of potentially marked-up text associated with them, and occasionally some more data too.
The content of a block tag can be any markup, apart from headings and other tags. Note that compared to ocamldoc, block tags do not extend to the end of the docstring. Instead, they are ended by a blank line, or a block that cannot be included in (a heading or another tag).
@deprecated <text>
- marks the element as deprecated. text
should describe when the element was deprecated, what to use as a replacement, and possibly the reason for the deprecation.@param <id> <text>
- associates the the given description (text) to the given parameter name ID. OCamldoc uses this tag for functions, methods, classes, and functors, but odoc
does not currently enforce this restriction.@raise <exn> <text>
- indicates that the element may raise exn
. The text should describe when this might occur. @raises
is a synonym for this tag.@return <text>
- describes the return value. @returns
is a synonym for this.@before <version> <text>
- allows differences in past behaviour to be described. This is intended to be used to document compatibility issues.@see <<URL>> <text>
- adds a reference to the URL (written between <
and >
delimiters), with text
as a comment.@see '<filename>' <text>
- adds a reference to the given file (written between single quotes), with the given text as comment. Note: odoc
currently doesn't turn this into a link in the output HTML.@see "<document-name>" <text>
- adds a reference to the given document name (written between double quotes), with the given text as comment. Note: As with the file reference, odoc
doesn't turn this into a link.
Page tags
These tags are the only tags that can be used on pages.
@children_order <order>
- defines the order, in the sidebar, of the content of a directory. It can only be used on index.mld
pages. <order>
must be a space-separated list of content. Pages are referred by filename, and modules are prefixed with module-
. Directories are suffixed with a /
. Here is an example:
@children_order content module-Unit dir1/
@toc_status <status>
determines the behaviour of the entry in the sidebar and breadcrumbs. It can only be used on index.mld
pages. <status>
can be either open
or hidden
. If it is open
, the content of the directory will always be displayed in the sidebar. If it is hidden
, it will be opened
but the directory entry, in the sidebar and breadcrumbs, will not be clickable.
Mathematics
odoc
2.2 introduced new markup for maths, available both for inline and block content. The syntax for the maths itself is LaTeX, and it is rendered by KaTeX in HTML output, dropped inline in the LaTeX output, and ignored in the man-page renderer.
To render maths inline, use {m <latex>}
, and for block mode use {math <latex>}
.
This is an inline equation: x=\frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}
. When rendered in block form, this becomes:
x=\frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}
See the KaTeX documentation for the HTML mode LaTeX support status.
Tables
odoc
2.3 introduced new markup for tables. This markup comes in two flavors: the light syntax and the heavy syntax.
The heavy syntax uses several markup: {table ...}
to define a table, {tr ...}
to define a row, and {th ...}
and {td ...}
to respectively define a header cell and a data cell. Direct children of tables have to be rows, and direct children of rows have to be cells. Similarly, rows have to be direct children of tables, and cells direct children of row. Cells can contain any markup.
For instance, the following table:
{table
{tr
{th Header 1}
{th Header 2}
{th Header 3}
}
{tr
{td Cell 1}
{td Cell with {e emphasized content}}
{td {v a block v} }
}
}
would render as
Header 1 | Header 2 | Header 3 |
---|
Cell 1 | Cell with emphasized content | a block |
The light syntax has the advantages of being simple to read, even as plain text. It is very similar to the GFM Markdown syntax, with the exception that it has to be enclosed in {t ...}
, and the inline markup is the OCamldoc one. It supports alignment for columns using the :
notation from the GFM syntax. ---
is the default alignment, :--
left-aligned, --:
right-aligned, and :---:
centered.
The following table, in light syntax:
{t
| Header 1 | Header 2 | Header 3 | Header 4|
| :------: | --------:|:---------|---------|
| centered | right | left | default |
omitted | bar at | start and| finish
| {e emph} | and | unaligned | bars |
}
would render as
Header 1 | Header 2 | Header 3 | Header 4 |
---|
centered | right | left | default |
omitted | bar at | start and | finish |
emph | and | unaligned | bars |
The light syntax has the advantages of being arguably more readable for small tables when viewing the source file directly. However, its content is restricted (for instance, no new line is allowed). The heavy syntax is easier to write, can be more readable for big tables, and supports having any kind of content inside. It does not support alignment (yet).
Odoc 3.0 introduced new markup for media. Media are nestable blocks, so they can be put inside lists and tables, but they cannot be inlined, for instance in a link.
There are currently three kinds of media: image, audio, and video. Each of them can refer to the file either using an asset reference, or a direct link.
The markup for images is {image:<link>}
, {image!<path>}
, {{image:<link>}Replacement text}
and {{image!<path>}Replacement text}
, where <link>
is a link and <path>
is a path to an asset. This path can be either relative or absolute.
The markup for videos and audios is similar, replacing image
by respectively video
and audio
.
The replacement text is used for backends that do not support media (latex and man), and for when a reference is unresolved. In the case of an image, it is also used to generate an alternative text.
Images are clickable and link to the image file.
The following source:
renders as: {image:https://picsum.photos/200/300}
renders as: mage:https://picsum.photos/200/300
The special comment:
(**/**)
is a stop comment. It acts as a toggle, causing subsequent elements to be omitted from the documentation. If the stop comment is repeated, the subsequent items will be visible once more.
The OCaml manual provides an instructive example:
class type foo =
object
(** comment for method m *)
method m : string
(**/**)
(** This method won't appear in the documentation *)
method bar : int
end
(** This value appears in the documentation, since the Stop special comment
in the class does not affect the parent module of the class.*)
val foo : string
(**/**)
(** The value bar does not appear in the documentation.*)
val bar : string
(**/**)
(** The type [t] appears, since in the documentation since the previous stop comment
toggled off the "no documentation mode". *)
type t = string
odoc
renders the output as here.
Page Structure
Producing good documentation for your library is more than simply annotating the various modules, type, and functions that are contained. odoc
expects the documentation to be structured in a logical way, and it will work best if the following conventions are applied.
The overall structure is that modules start with a preamble or 'Lead Section' that serves as an overview of the most important information about the module. This is followed by the module's content, organised into sections and subsections. Its structure will be used to populate a table of contents that will be placed in the HTML immediately after the preamble and rendered by default as a sidebar.
The preamble's first paragraph will be treated as the module synopsis, and it will be used as a short description of the module when it appears in a list of modules elsewhere in the documentation of the library.
The top-comment is the first element of a signature, if it is a documentation comment. For example, in an .mli
file:
(** This is the top-comment of the current module. *)
module M : sig
(** This is the top-comment of [M]. *)
(* ... *)
end
As an exception, open
statements and attributes can be placed before the top-comment. For example:
[@@@ocaml.warning "-6"]
(* Copyright header *)
open Base
(** This is the top-comment *)
(* ... *)
Note that the top-comment can't be attached to a declaration, for example:
(** This is {e not} the top-comment because it's attached to [t]. *)
type t
Preamble
The preamble is composed of the comment attached to a declaration and the top-comment of the corresponding signature, if there is one. It is special only because it will be placed in the header
part of the page, just before the table of contents (if any), and is used to compute the synopsis.
(** This is the comment attached to the declaration. This paragraph will be the
first of the preamble. *)
module M : sig
(** This is the top-comment of the expansion. This paragraph will be the
second of the preamble. *)
(* ... *)
end
The preamble stops at the first heading. The rest is moved into the content
part of the page. For example, the next two snippets will render the same way:
module M : sig
(** Preamble.
{1 Heading}
This paragraph is not part of the preamble. *)
end
module M : sig
(** Preamble. *)
(** {1 Heading}
This paragraph is not part of the preamble. *)
end
Note: A comment attached to a declaration shouldn't contain any heading.
Synopsis
A module's synopsis is the first paragraph of the Preamble, if the preamble starts with a paragraph. This also applies to module types, classes, etc.
It is rendered in {!modules:...}
lists and after expanded aliases.
Note that the synopsis is computed on top of the preamble. In these two examples, the synopsis is the same:
(** This paragraph is the synopsis of the module [M].
This paragraph is no longer the synopsis and won't be rendered in the
current page near the declaration of [M]. This paragraph will be part of
[M]'s preamble. *)
module M : sig
(* ... *)
end
module M : sig
(** This paragraph is the synopsis of the module [M]. *)
(* ... *)
end
Sections and Headings
Both API references and documentation pages can be split into sections that can be introduced with level-1 headings. Each section can also have subsections (level-2) and subsubsections (level-3).
Additionally, paragraphs can be annotated with level-4 or level-5 headings. Note that paragraph headings are not be included in the generated table of contents and thus should be used to introduce examples, comments, or other complementary notes. An alternative would be to consider splitting into multiple files.
Finally, documentation pages should start with a level-0 heading:
{0 Title of the page}
.
Level-0 headings should not be used elsewhere.
The syntax for declaring sections is as follows:
{[0-5] <text>}
or
{[0-5]:<label> <text>}
where the number represents the sectioning level. <label>
is an optional label for the section, allowing it to be referenced via the {!section-<label>}
reference. For example:
{2:foobar Foo Bar}
...
See {!section-foobar} for details
In this case, the reference text would be "Foo Bar," so the paragraph would read "See Foo Bar for details."
Sections with a label cannot be referenced via the section title, only using the label.
Note that label names can contain -
, but if they do, you have to quote the label name in the reference link as follows:
{2:foo-bar Foo Bar}
...
See {!section-"foo-bar"} for details
You can use _
instead of -
to avoid this syntax.
Sections can also be cross-referenced from another page. If you define the following section in a a.mld
file:
{1:foo Foo}
and then want to reference it from another b.mld
page, you can use the following syntax:
See {!page-a.foo} for details
Configuration file
odoc
3.0 introduced a per-package configuration file, odoc-config.sexp
. This file is required if you wish to make use of the cross-package linking feature, or sometimes if you wish to link to other libraries.
As an example, here is odoc
's configuration file:
(libraries fmt)
(packages odoc-driver cmdliner odig)
This file applies to all pages and all modules of all libraries in a package. With this config file, the modules of the fmt
library, and the pages of the odoc-driver
, cmdliner
and odig
packages can be linked to via the following syntax:
{!/fmt/module-Fmt}
{!/odoc-driver/page-index}
Important note: In order for this to work on ocaml.org, it is necessary that the tool used to build the docs is aware that extra packages are required. If the package is already a dependency, then nothing needs to be done. If it can be added without introducing dependency cycles, it can be added to the normal dependencies field. If it would otherwise introduce a cycle into the dependencies, then it must be added to an extra field. In the case of odoc, because the docs of odoc
wish to link to the docs of odoc-driver
, but odoc-driver
depends on odoc, the following must be added to the odoc
's opam file:
x-extra-doc-deps: [
"odoc-driver" {>= "3.0.0"}
]