A cancelable computation.
A computation basically holds the status, i.e.
- running,
- returned, or
- canceled,
of some sort of computation.
A hopefully enlightening analogy is that a computation is a kind of single-shot atomic event.
Another hopefully helpful analogy is that a computation is basically like a cancelable promise and a basic non-cancelable promise can be implemented trivially on top of a computation.
To define a computation, one first creates it and then arranges for the computation to be completed by returning a value through it or by canceling it with an exception at some point in the future. There are no restrictions on what it means for a computation to be running. The cancelation status of a computation can be polled or checked explicitly. Observers can also attach triggers to a computation to get a signal when the computation is completed or await the computation.
Here is an example:
run begin fun () ->
let computation =
Computation.create ()
in
let@ computer =
finally Domain.join @@ fun () ->
Domain.spawn @@ fun () ->
let rec fib i =
Computation.check computation;
if i <= 1 then
i
else
fib (i - 1) + fib (i - 2)
in
Computation.capture computation
fib 10
in
let@ canceler =
finally Domain.join @@ fun () ->
Domain.spawn @@ fun () ->
Unix.sleepf 0.1;
Computation.cancel computation
@@ Exn_bt.get_callstack 2 Exit
in
Computation.await computation
end
In this framework, a fiber is always associated with at least a single computation. However, it is possible for multiple fibers to share a single computation and it is also possible for a single fiber to perform multiple computations. Furthermore, the computation associated with a fiber can be changed by the fiber.
Computations are not hierarchical. In other words, computations do not directly implement structured concurrency. However, it is possible to propagate cancelation to implement structured concurrency on top of computations.
Operations on computations are either wait-free or lock-free and designed to avoid starvation and complete in amortized constant time. The properties of operations to complete a computation depend on the properties of actions attached to the triggers.
Interface for creating
Represents a cancelable computation. A computation is either running or has been completed either with a return value or with canceling exception with a backtrace.
ℹ️ Once a computation becomes completed it no longer changes state.
🏎️ A computation that has been completed is a small object that only holds onto the return value or the canceling exception with a backtrace.
⚠️ In the running state a computation may refer to any number of triggers and it is important to make sure that any triggers attached to a computation are detached when they are no longer needed unless the computation has been completed.
val create : ?mode:[ `FIFO | `LIFO ] -> unit -> 'a t
create ()
creates a new computation in the running state.
The optional mode
specifies the order in which triggers attached to the computation will be signaled after the computation has been completed. `FIFO
ordering may reduce latency of IO bound computations and is the default. `LIFO
may improve thruput of CPU bound computations and be preferable on a work-stealing scheduler, for example.
ℹ️ Typically the creator of a computation object arranges for the computation to be completed by using the capture
helper, for example. However, it is possible and safe to race multiple threads of execution to complete a computation.
finished
is a constant finished computation.
val try_return : 'a t -> 'a -> bool
try_return computation value
attempts to complete the computation with the specified value
and returns true
on success. Otherwise returns false
, which means that the computation had already been completed before.
val return : 'a t -> 'a -> unit
return computation value
is equivalent to try_return computation value |> ignore
.
val try_finish : unit t -> bool
try_finish computation
is equivalent to try_return computation ()
.
val finish : unit t -> unit
finish computation
is equivalent to try_finish computation |> ignore
.
val try_capture : 'a t -> ('b -> 'a) -> 'b -> bool
try_capture computation fn x
calls fn x
and tries to complete the computation with the value returned or the exception raised by the call and returns true
on success. Otherwise returns false
, which means that the computation had already been completed before.
val capture : 'a t -> ('b -> 'a) -> 'b -> unit
capture computation fn x
is equivalent to try_capture computation fn x |> ignore
.
Interface for canceling
type packed =
| Packed : 'a t -> packed
An existential wrapper for computations.
try_cancel computation exn_bt
attempts to mark the computation as canceled with the specified exception and backtrace and returns true
on success. Otherwise returns false
, which means that the computation had already been completed before.
cancel computation exn_bt
is equivalent to try_cancel computation exn_bt |> ignore
.
Interface for timeouts
val cancel_after : 'a t -> seconds:float -> Exn_bt.t -> unit
cancel_after ~seconds computation exn_bt
arranges to cancel
the computation after the specified time with the specified exception and backtrace. Completion of the computation before the specified time effectively cancels the timeout.
ℹ️ The behavior is that cancel_after
first checks that seconds
is not negative, and then
- on OCaml 5,
cancel_after
will perform the Cancel_after
effect, and - on OCaml 4,
cancel_after
will call the cancel_after
operation of the current handler.
Interface for polling
val is_running : 'a t -> bool
is_running computation
determines whether the computation is in the running state meaning that it has not yet been completed.
val is_canceled : 'a t -> bool
is_canceled computation
determines whether the computation is in the canceled state.
canceled computation
returns the exception that the computation has been canceled with or returns None
in case the computation has not been canceled.
check computation
is equivalent to Option.iter Exn_bt.raise (canceled computation)
.
val peek : 'a t -> ('a, Exn_bt.t) Stdlib.result option
peek computation
returns the result of the computation or None
in case the computation has not completed.
Interface for awaiting
try_attach computation trigger
tries to attach the trigger to be signaled on completion of the computation and returns true
on success. Otherwise returns false
, which means that the computation has already been completed or the trigger has already been signaled.
⚠️ Always detach
a trigger after it is no longer needed unless the computation is known to have been completed.
detach computation trigger
signals the trigger and detaches it from the computation.
🏎️ The try_attach
and detach
operations essentially implement a lock-free bag. While not formally wait-free, the implementation is designed to avoid starvation by making sure that any potentially expensive operations are performed cooperatively.
await computation
waits for the computation to complete and either returns the value of the completed computation or raises the exception the computation was canceled with.
ℹ️ If the computation has already completed, then await
returns or raises immediately without performing any effects.
wait computation
waits for the computation to complete.
Interface for propagating cancelation
canceler ~from ~into
creates a trigger that propagates cancelation from
one computation into
another on signal. The returned trigger is not attached to any computation.
The returned trigger is usually attached to the computation from
which cancelation is to be propagated and the trigger should usually also be detached after it is no longer needed.
The intended use case of canceler
is as a low level building block of structured concurrency mechanisms. Picos does not require concurrent programming models to be hierarchical or structured.
⚠️ The returned trigger will be in the awaiting state, which means that it is an error to call Trigger.await
or Trigger.on_signal
on it.
val attach_canceler : from:_ t -> into:_ t -> Trigger.t
attach_canceler ~from ~into
tries to attach a canceler
to the computation from
to propagate cancelation to the computation into
and returns the canceler
when successful. If the computation from
has already been canceled, the exception that from
was canceled with will be raised.
Interface for schedulers
type Stdlib.Effect.t += private
| Cancel_after : {
seconds : float;
Guaranteed to be non-negative.
exn_bt : Exn_bt.t;
computation : 'a t;
} -> unit Stdlib.Effect.t
Schedulers may handle the Cancel_after
effect to customize the behavior of cancel_after
.
The scheduler should typically attach a trigger to the computation passed with the effect and arrange the operation to be canceled upon signal.
The scheduler should measure time using a monotonic clock.
In case the fiber permits propagation of cancelation and the computation associated with the fiber has been canceled the scheduler is free to discontinue the fiber before setting up the timeout.
val with_action :
?mode:[ `FIFO | `LIFO ] ->
'x ->
'y ->
(Trigger.t -> 'x -> 'y -> unit) ->
'a t
with_action x y resume
is equivalent to
let computation = create () in
let trigger = Trigger.from_action x y resume in
let _ : bool = try_attach computation trigger in
computation
⚠️ The same warnings as with Trigger.from_action
apply.
Design rationale
The computation concept can be seen as a kind of single-shot atomic event that is a generalization of both a cancelation context or token and of a promise. Unlike a typical promise mechanism, a computation can be canceled. Unlike a typical cancelation mechanism, a computation can and should also be completed in case it is not canceled. This promotes proper scoping of computations and resource cleanup at completion, which is how the design evolved from a more traditional cancelation context design.
In this framework, every fiber is associated with a computation. Being able to return a value through the computation means that no separate promise is necessarily required to hold the result of a fiber. On the other hand, in this framework, multiple fibers may share a single computation. This allows multiple fibers to be canceled efficiently through a single atomic update. In other words, the design allows various higher level patterns to be implemented efficiently.
Instead of directly implementing a hierarchy of computations, the design allows attaching triggers to computations and a special trigger constructor is provided for propagating cancelation. This helps to keep the implementation lean, i.e. not substantially heavier than a typical promise implementation.
Finally, just like with Trigger.Await
, a key idea is that the handler of Computation.Cancel_after
does not need to run arbitrary user defined code. The action of any trigger attached to a computation either comes from some scheduler calling Trigger.on_signal
or from Computation.canceler
.