Page
Library
Module
Module type
Parameter
Class
Class type
Source
Toplevel_expect_test is a modified OCaml toplevel that captures its output and compares it against an expected one. The primary goal is to test various kind of errors:
Since the toplevel is able to print most things out of the box, this gives an easy way to test the result of an evaluation as well.
Simply write a .ml file containing the same phrases you would write in a toplevel, and wherever you want to check the output write [%%expect]
. Then run the tool on the file. It will fill the [%%expect]
nodes with the real output and write the result in a .corrected
file. For convenience, the tool will output the diff between the original file and the corrected one. You can then copy the .corrected
file.
For instance:
$ cat test.ml
let x = 1 + 'e'
[%%expect]
type t = intt
[%%expect]
$ ocaml-expect test.ml
---test.ml
+++test.ml.corrected
@@@@@@@@@@ -1,6 +1,14 @@@@@@@@@@
let x = 1 + 'e'
-|[%%expect]
+|[%%expect{|
+|Line _, characters 12-15:
+|Error: This expression has type char but an expression was expected of type
+| int
+||}]
type t = intt
-|[%%expect]
+|[%%expect{|
+|Line _, characters 9-13:
+|Error: Unbound type constructor intt
+|Hint: Did you mean int?
+||}]
$ cp test.ml.corrected test.ml
$ ocaml-expect test.ml && echo success
success
Warning: be sure to write [%%expect]
with 2 percent signs
Note that you can use whatever directives you use in the toplevel: #load
, #use
, ...
The matching of the toplevel output against the expectation is done using ppx_expect. This mean that you can use the same modifiers such as (glob)
or (regexp)
in expectations.
ocaml-expect doesn't print the toplevel outcome in case of success. This is because it is often used to test errors. You can change this behavior at any time using the directive #verbose
:
#verbose true;;
let x = 6 * 7
[%expect{|
val x : int = 42
|}]
By default ocaml-expect hides line numbers in error messages, as they can change often and produce useless diffs. You can enable them using the directive #print_line_numbers
:
#print_line_numbers true;;
let x = 1 + 2
[%%expect{|
Line 2, characters 12-15:
Error: This expression has type char but an expression was expected of type
int
|}]
You can also enable just column numbers, which change less often due to edits in preceding code. Use the directive #print_column_numbers
:
#print_column_numbers true;;
let x = 1 + 2
[%%expect{|
Line _, characters 12-15:
Error: This expression has type char but an expression was expected of type
int
|}]
Sometimes values contains line numbers, either from a ppx rewriter or from some special value such as Pervasives.__LOC__
. Whenever the expection before some code capturing the line number changes, the line number will change. This can create annoying differences in a test suite.
There are three ways to make line numbers predictable:
[%%expect]
node#reset_line_numbers
#reset_line_numbers_after_expect
For instance:
Array.make n 0
[%expect{|
- : int array = [|0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0|]
|}]
#reset_line_numbers;;
__LINE__
[%expect{|
- : int = 1
|}]
Or:
#reset_line_numbers_after_expect true;;
let _ = __LINE__
[%expect{|
- : int = 1
|}]
let _ = __LINE__
[%expect{|
- : int = 1
|}]
Whatever the value of [n] is, the line number of __LINE__
will always be 1.
Instead of the normal mode, you can ask the toplevel to produce a structured document containing a list of code blocks with the toplevel response.
This is useful when you want to include some code examples with their output in a document. For that pass the flag -sexp
:
$ cat test.ml
#verbose true;;
let x = 42
[%%expect {|
val x : int = 42
|}]
$ ocaml-expect -sexp test.ml
((parts
(((name "")
(chunks
(((ocaml_code "#verbose true;;\
\n\
\nlet x = 42\
\n")
(toplevel_response "\
\nval x : int = 42\
\n")))))))
(matched false))
You can use the library toplevel_expect_test.types
to interpret the output. You can see the types in types/toplevel_expect_test_types.mli
.
In addition you can add [@@@part "blah"]
attributes in your code to organize it. This gives you an easy way to split the results in different part of the final document.
You can build a custom toplevel following this example:
$ echo 'Toplevel_expect_test.Main.main ()' > main.ml
$ ocamlfind ocamlc -linkpkg -linkall -predicates create_toploop \
-package toplevel_expect_test -o foo