package ppx_sexp_conv
Install
    
    dune-project
 Dependency
Authors
Maintainers
Sources
md5=acbe8a2727a29c8f2fa8da42046f5861
    
    
  sha512=036582cbcd49aad0737bbbdf5f680192e55a9f3051c8dece439a6c6ea989b59077c88130d833b01a38d990e563f7dde9f5be7e1cd0ffaaf59bd913d6fbd63bb3
    
    
  doc/CHANGES.html
v0.11
- Depend on ppxlib instead of (now deprecated) ppx_core, ppx_driver and ppx_metaquot.
v0.10
- Added new [@@deriving sexp]record-field attribute,[@sexp.omit_nil], for a field that is omitted if its sexp representation is().
- Improved [%sexp_of: 'a]and[%of_sexp: 'a]to not expose variable names intended for internal use.
v0.9
113.43.00
- Fix generator for polymorphic types where var names clashes with type name: type 't t = ...
113.33.00
- Clean up the documentation for sexplib, modernizing it to include ppx_sexp_conv, and breaking up the documentation between sexplib andppx_sexp_conv. Also changed the formatting to use org-mode, so it will render properly on github. Markdown doesn't render well by default, unless you use quite different conventions about linebeaks.
113.24.00
- Trying to improve the tests in ppx_sexp_conv because they are a mess. At least all tests are automatic now. And more things are tested like the sexpification of exceptions.
- Update to follow Type_convandPpx_coreevolution.
- Make ppx_sexp_conv correctly handle aliases to polymorphic variants: - type t = - type u = t@@deriving sexp- type v =u |- B- @@deriving sexp- Before, - v_of_sexpwould never manage to read- B. This problem is now fixed if you usesexp_poly- onu- instead ofsexp- , and if you don't, you get an "unbound value __u_of_sexp__". People should usesexp_poly- when they have a polymorphic variant type that is not syntactically a polymorphic variant, but in practice it's simpler to replacesexp- bysexp_poly` when faced with the error above.- The need for - sexp_polyshould happen only in one new case: an implementation says- type u = t@@deriving sexp- but the interface says `type u =A- . (the old case where it was already needed is when you have an interface that says `type u = t `@@deriving sexpand in some other implementation you try to say- type t =That_module.t |- A`@@deriving sexp``).