package ppx_map
Install
Dune Dependency
Authors
Maintainers
Sources
md5=c0ac31ffa9cded558377eebf6a25037e
sha512=9dc615f364625857ffa58dead6e979dbc7db64711de21de767dedc0e52a06200c4f7ffa40fd4b84adfecb9a7d54bc05c8f4d5eba19e5a82bb3f1f71fab0da18d
README.md.html
ppx_map
ppx_map
is a PPX rewriter to simplify the definition of maps.
Usage
Simple cases
If the type of your map keys is simple enough (bool
, char
, float
, int
, string
or unit
) and the PPX can deduce it, it is as simple as:
[%map 0 => "zero"; 1 => "one"; 2 => "two"]
which will give something similar to:
let module Int_map = Map.Make (Int) in
Int_map.(empty |> add 0 "zero" |> add 1 "one" |> add 2 "two")
The extension is able to automatically type the map if the first key is a non-bound value (e.g. not defined by a let
) of the types given above. For example,
let a = 0 in
[%map a => "zero"; 1 => "one"; 2 => "two"]
will give the following compilation error:
Error: `map' cannot infer the type of this value. You need to give an explicit
bool, char, float, int, string or unit.
whereas
let a = 0 in
[%map 1 => "one"; a => "zero"; 2 => "two"]
will work just fine.
More complex cases
Empty maps
While it may seem trivial, creating an empty map requires a little more than just [%map]
; a type must be specified:
[%map.Int]
or
[%map Int]
will do the trick. I don’t know which syntax I prefer; pick your own and stick to it!
Simple modules
If the first key you give is a bound value, you need to help the rewriter a little:
let (a, b, c) = (0, 1, 2) in
[%map.Int a => "zero"; b => "one"; c => "two"]
or
let (a, b, c) = (0, 1, 2) in
[%map Int; a => "zero"; b => "one"; c => "two"]
Again, you can decide which syntax you prefer.
Functors
You can also use functors! But only the second syntax is going to work:
[%map Functor (Module); key => value]
These functors need to be of arity 1 (Functor (Module) (Module')
cannot be used as it wouldn’t work well with OCaml’s parser). As we could expect, using a generative functor gives the following compilation error:
Error: This expression has type 'a $Map.t
but an expression was expected of type 'b
The type constructor $Map.t would escape its scope
Don’t do that!
Also, I don’t really see why you’d ever need to use functors here, but that was fun to implement 🙂