Should this field be parsed lazily? Lazy applies only to message-type
fields. It means that when the outer message is initially parsed, the
inner message's contents will not be parsed but instead stored in encoded
form. The inner message will actually be parsed when it is first accessed.
This is only a hint. Implementations are free to choose whether to use
eager or lazy parsing regardless of the value of this option. However,
setting this option true suggests that the protocol author believes that
using lazy parsing on this field is worth the additional bookkeeping
overhead typically needed to implement it.
This option does not affect the public interface of any generated code;
all method signatures remain the same. Furthermore, thread-safety of the
interface is not affected by this option; const methods remain safe to
call from multiple threads concurrently, while non-const methods continue
to require exclusive access.
Note that implementations may choose not to check required fields within
a lazy sub-message. That is, calling IsInitialized() on the outer message
may return true even if the inner message has missing required fields.
This is necessary because otherwise the inner message would have to be
parsed in order to perform the check, defeating the purpose of lazy
parsing. An implementation which chooses not to check required fields
must be consistent about it. That is, for any particular sub-message, the
implementation must either always check its required fields, or never
check its required fields, regardless of whether or not the message has
been parsed.
As of 2021, lazy does no correctness checks on the byte stream during
parsing. This may lead to crashes if and when an invalid byte stream is
finally parsed upon access.
TODO(b/211906113): Enable validation on lazy fields.