package coq-waterproof

  1. Overview
  2. Docs
Coq proofs in a style that resembles non-mechanized mathematical proofs

Install 

dune-project
 Dependency

github.com Readme Changelog Edit opam file Versions (3)

Authors

  1. J
    Jelle Wemmenhove
  2. P
    Pim Otte
  3. B
    Balthazar Pathiachvili
  4. D
    Dick Arends
  5. C
    Cosmin Manea
  6. L
    Lulof Pirée
  7. A
    Adrian Vrămuleţ
  8. T
    Tudor Voicu
  9. J
    Jim Portegies <j.w.portegies@tue.nl>

Maintainers

  1. J
    Jim Portegies <j.w.portegies@tue.nl>

Sources

3.1.0+9.0.tar.gz
md5=7cfe30aceb61e154ed905e048bdf2cb7
sha512=006bf05727d2aa21cebe332ff5a027fdd8843c574753fd5b8d0486e4df7bd447a4f538c3c92736011734c29c601d3a77c2f1a1ee5b3645a7666766ed32907777

doc/coq-waterproof.plugin/Waterproof/Wp_auto/index.html

Module Waterproof.Wp_autoSource

Sourceval exists_evaluable_reference : Environ.env -> Evaluable.t -> bool

Same function as Auto.exists_evaluable_reference

Sourceval pr_info_nop : unit -> unit

Prints "idtac" if the log field is true

Sourceval tclTryDbg : (unit -> unit) -> Backtracking.trace Proofview.tactic -> Backtracking.trace Proofview.tactic

Tries the given tactic and calls an info printer if it fails

Sourceval hintmap_of : Environ.env -> Evd.evar_map -> Names.Id.Pred.t -> Evd.econstr -> Hints.hint_db -> Hints.FullHint.t list

Creates a function that takes a hint database and returns a hint list

Searches a sequence of at most n tactics within db_list and lems that solves the goal

The goal cannot contain evars

Sourceval wp_auto : bool -> int -> Tactypes.delayed_open_constr list -> string list -> Backtracking.trace Proofview.tactic

Waterproof auto

This function is a rewrite around Auto.auto with the same arguments to be able to retrieve which hints have been used in case of success.

Returns a typed tactic containing the full trace

Sourceval rwp_auto : bool -> int -> Tactypes.delayed_open_constr list -> string list -> Pp.t list -> Pp.t list -> Backtracking.trace Proofview.tactic

Restricted Waterproof auto

This function acts the same as wp_auto but will fail if all proof found contain at least one must-use lemma that is unused or one hint that is in the forbidden list.